4.8 Article

Meta-Learning in Neural Networks: A Survey

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3079209

关键词

Task analysis; Optimization; Training; Machine learning algorithms; Predictive models; Neural networks; Deep learning; Meta-learning; learning-to-learn; few-shot learning; transfer learning; neural architecture search

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council of the U.K. (EPSRC) [EP/S000631/1]
  2. U.K. MOD University Defence Research Collaboration (UDRC) in Signal Processing
  3. EPSRC [EP/R026173/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The field of meta-learning, or learning-to-learn, has gained significant interest in recent years. Unlike conventional approaches to AI, meta-learning aims to improve the learning algorithm itself by utilizing multiple learning experiences. This provides an opportunity to address challenges in deep learning, including data and computation limitations, as well as generalization.
The field of meta-learning, or learning-to-learn, has seen a dramatic rise in interest in recent years. Contrary to conventional approaches to AI where tasks are solved from scratch using a fixed learning algorithm, meta-learning aims to improve the learning algorithm itself, given the experience of multiple learning episodes. This paradigm provides an opportunity to tackle many conventional challenges of deep learning, including data and computation bottlenecks, as well as generalization. This survey describes the contemporary meta-learning landscape. We first discuss definitions of meta-learning and position it with respect to related fields, such as transfer learning and hyperparameter optimization. We then propose a new taxonomy that provides a more comprehensive breakdown of the space of meta-learning methods today. We survey promising applications and successes of meta-learning such as few-shot learning and reinforcement learning. Finally, we discuss outstanding challenges and promising areas for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据