4.5 Article

Functional Logistic Regression for Motor Fault Classification Using Acoustic Data in Frequency Domain

期刊

ENERGIES
卷 15, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en15155535

关键词

functional data analysis; motor diagnostics; acoustic signal; functional logistic regression

资金

  1. AGH's Research University Excellence Initiative under the project Interpretable methods of process diagnosis using statistics and machine learning
  2. Polish National Science Centre project Process Fault Prediction and Detection [UMO-2021/41/B/ST7/03851]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motor diagnostics is an important research topic, and acoustic signal analysis can be applied to motor diagnostics. In this study, functional data analysis is used to represent the spectrum of acoustic signals using B-spline basis and construct a classifier for motor diagnostics. The results show that binary classifiers perform well in classification, while multiclass classifiers are more sensitive to dataset size.
Motor diagnostics is an important subject for consideration. Electric motors of different types are present in a multitude of object, from consumer goods through everyday use devices to specialized equipment. Diagnostic assessment of motors using acoustic signals is an interesting field, as microphones are present everywhere and are relatively easy sensors to process. In this paper, we analyze acoustic signals for the purpose of motor diagnostics using functional data analysis. We represent the spectrum (FFT) of the acoustic signals on a B-Spline basis and construct a classifier based on that representation. The results are promising, especially for binary classifiers, while multiclass (softmax regression) shows more sensitivity to dataset size. In particular, we show that while we are able to obtain almost perfect classification for binary cases, multiclass classifiers can struggle depending on the training/testing split. This is especially visible for determining the number of broken teeth, which is a non-issue for binary classifiers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据