4.0 Article

Effect of Intraprocedural Cortisol Measurement on ACTH-stimulated Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac104

关键词

primary aldosteronism; adrenal vein sampling; intraprocedural cortisol measurement

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [JP17ek0109122, JP20ek0109352]
  2. National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Japan [27-1402, 30-1008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A multicenter observational study found that intraprocedural cortisol measurement (ICM) significantly increased the success rate of adrenal vein sampling (AVS). However, ICM had no significant impact on subtype diagnosis. Therefore, the use of ICM during AVS is recommended.
Context: Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) loading is used to increase the success rate of adrenal vein sampling (AVS). Objective: We aimed to determine the effect of intraprocedural cortisol measurement (ICM) on ACTH-stimulated AVS (AS-AVS) owing to a lack of reliable data on this topic. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study took place in 28 tertiary centers in Japan. Among 4057 patients enrolled, 2396 received both basal AVS (B-AVS) and AS-AVS and were divided into 2 groups according to whether ICM was used. The effect of ICM on AS-AVS was measured. Results: In patients who underwent both AVS procedures, the ICM group had significantly higher success rates for both B-AVS and AS-AVS than the non-ICM group did. However, the probability of failure of AS-AVS after a successful B-AVS and the probability of success of AS-AVS after a failed B-AVS were not significantly different in the 2 groups. For subtype diagnosis, propensity-score matching revealed no significant difference between the 2 groups, and the discrepancy rate between B-AVS and AS-AVS for subtype diagnosis was also not significantly different. Conclusion: ICM significantly increased the success rate of B-AVS and AS-AVS in protocols in which both AVS procedures were performed and had no effect on subtype diagnosis. However, in protocols in which both AVS procedures were performed, the results suggest ICM may not be necessary when performing AS-AVS if ICM is used only when B-AVS is performed. Our study suggests that ICM during AVS plays an important role and should be recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据