4.8 Article

Retinoic Acid Signaling in B Cells Is Required for the Generation of an Effective T-Independent Immune Response

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00643

关键词

retinoic acid; B cell; peritoneum; marginal zone; immunoglobulins

资金

  1. Welcome Trust [091823/z/10/z]
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  4. UK-MRC [MR/J006742/1]
  5. Wellcome Trust [091823/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC [G0802068] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J006742/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Retinoic acid (RA) plays an important role in the balance of inflammation and tolerance in T cells. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that RA facilitates IgA isotype switching in B cells in vivo. However, it is unclear whether RA has a direct effect on T-independent B cell responses in vivo. To address this question, we generated a mouse model where RA signaling is specifically silenced in the B cell lineage. This was achieved through the overexpression of a dominant negative receptor a for RA (dnRAR alpha) in the B cell lineage. In this model, we found a dramatic reduction in marginal zone (MZ) B cells and accumulation of transitional 2 B cells in the spleen. We also observed a reduction in B1 B cells in the peritoneum with a defect in the T-independent B cell response against 2,4,6-trinitrophenyl. This was not a result of inhibited development of B cells in the bone marrow, but likely the result of both defective expression of S1P(1) in MZ B cells and a defect in the development of MZ and B1 B cells. This suggests that RAR alpha expression in B cells is important for B cell frequency in the MZ and peritoneum, which is crucial for the generation of T-independent humoral responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据