期刊
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF CONSULTATION-LIAISON PSYCHIATRY
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 302-313出版社
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
关键词
euthanasia; physician-assisted-death; ethics; disability; depression
资金
- Intramural Research Program of the NIH Clinical Center [ZIA CL010539]
A minority of the US public supports physician-assisted death (PAD) for people with nonterminal illnesses (PAD-NT) in the context of inadequate resources. Support for PAD-NT is lower for mental illness than for physical disability.
Background: Physician-assisted death (PAD) for people with nonterminal illnesses (PAD-NT) is a controversial practice legal in some countries and increasingly debated in others, including the United States. A major concern about legalization of PAD-NT is that a lack of resources may drive some with mental illnesses or physical disabilities to seek PAD. Objective: To assess US public opinion on PAD-NT under conditions of resource limitation. Methods: The authors surveyed 2139 US adults matched to the US population in sex, age, racelethnicity, education, political affiliation, and income. After giving their opinions regarding terminal PAD and PAD-NT in response to traditional PAD survey questions, respondents were randomly presented one of 4 scenarios of persons with nonterminal conditions requesting PAD-NT who lacked adequate resources to maintain their quality of life. The type of resources lacking (social or health care) and medical condition (mental or physical disability) were varied. Respondents' views regarding PAD-NT for the scenario specifically and legalization generally were then reassessed. Results: At baseline, 55.4% of respondents supported legalizing terminal PAD, and 36.9% supported legalizing PAD-NT. After analyzing the scenarios, 28.2% (range 18.6%-39.7%) agreed/strongly agreed with legalizing PAD-NT generally and 23.7% (15.2%-33. 7%) agreed/strongly agreed with PAD-NT for the instance depicted, with mental illness scenarios receiving much lower support; respondents' comments suggest devaluation of life with physical disability versus with mental illness. Being politically liberal, not religious, and assigned physical disability scenarios were associated with greater support for PAD-NT in multivariable analyses. Conclusions: A minority of the US public supports PAD-NT in the context of inadequate resources, with much lower support for PAD-NT for mental illness than for physical disability, suggesting that PAD-NT policy debates and future research should address the issue of whether sufficient resources must be available to potential requestors of PAD-NT.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据