4.8 Article

NET Confusion

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00259

关键词

host defense; extracellular trap; inflammation; inflammatory disorder; neutrophil

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institutes of Health IDeA Program COBRE grant [GM110732]
  3. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch project [1009546]
  4. Montana State University Agricultural Experiment Station
  5. NIFA [1009546, 913358] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrophils are arguably the most important white blood cell for defense against bacterial and fungal infections. These leukocytes are produced in high numbers on a daily basis in humans and are recruited rapidly to injured/infected tissues. Phagocytosis and subsequent intraphagosomal killing and digestion of microbes have historically been the accepted means by which neutrophils carry out their role in innate host defense. Indeed, neutrophils contain and produce numerous cytotoxic molecules, including antimicrobial peptides, proteases, and reactive oxygen species, that are highly effective at killing the vast majority of ingested microbes. On the other hand, it is these characteristics - high numbers and toxicity - that endow neutrophils with the potential to injure and destroy host tissues. This potential is borne out by many inflammatory processes and diseases. Therefore, it is not surprising that host mechanisms exist to control virtually all steps in the neutrophil activation process and to prevent unintended neutrophil activation and/or lysis during the resolution of inflammatory responses or during steady-state turnover. The notion that neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) form by cytolysis as a standard host defense mechanism seems inconsistent with these aforementioned neutrophil containment processes. It is with this caveat in mind that we provide perspective on the role of NETs in human host defense and disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据