4.3 Article

Preparation and evaluation of LA-PEG-SPION, a targeted MRI contrast agent for liver cancer

期刊

OPEN LIFE SCIENCES
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 952-959

出版社

DE GRUYTER POLAND SP Z O O
DOI: 10.1515/biol-2022-0074

关键词

liver cancer; asialoglycoprotein receptor; superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles; MRI contrast agent

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81860304, 82160329]
  2. Natural Science Research Foundation of Jilin Province for Sciences and Technology [20200201511JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study synthesized a targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent for liver cancer cells and demonstrated its potential and characteristics in vitro experiments.
This study aims to synthesize a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent that can specifically target the asialoglycoprotein receptor of liver cancer cells and evaluate its ability as a targeted MRI contrast agent. Lactobionic acid (LA) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) were used to modify superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION) to obtain LA-PEG-SPION. LA-PEG-SPION was uniformly spherical under the electron microscope, with regular morphology and good dispersion. The particle size of LA-PEG-SPION was about 30 +/- 4.5 nm, and its surface potential was about 31 +/- 1.5 mV. LA-PEG-SPION had no toxicity or low toxicity to HepG2 cells and HeLa cells, even at 400 mu g/mL. The uptake of LA-PEG-SPION by HepG2 cells was higher than that of SPION, with increased blue-stained particles. The fluorescent labeling rate of HepG2 cells reached 68.8%, which was higher than that of the control group. In vitro, MRI showed that the T2-weighted signal intensity of HepG2 cells was lower than that of the control group. Conclusively, LA-PEG-SPION nanoparticles are synthesized in a simple and efficient way. They are successfully applied to the T2-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in liver cancer in vitro, and they have the potential to be used for in vivo research and clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据