4.3 Article

Competitive-Reduction Chemistry on Ni-Doped FeS2 Catalyst Reinforcing Acid-Corrosion Resistance for Stable Hydrogen Evolution Reactions

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202200044

关键词

antiacid corrosion; competitive-reduction chemistry; hydrogen evolution reactions; transition-metal chalcogenides

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [51972235]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [22ZR1465600]
  3. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at the Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ni-doped FeS2 nanowire arrays (Ni-FeS2 NWs), fabricated through a simple doping strategy, exhibit enhanced antiacid stability and catalytic activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) compared to FeS2. This is attributed to the different HER active centers at S and Fe sites in Ni-FeS2 and FeS2, respectively.
Transition-metal chalcogenides are promising low-cost hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalysts; however, they suffer from serious electrochemical corrosion in acidic environment. Herein, it is proposed that Ni-doped FeS2 nanowire arrays (Ni-FeS2 NWs) fabricated through a simple doping strategy show significantly enhanced antiacid stability during HER process relative to its FeS2 counterpart enabled by a S-site competitive-reduction chemistry. Transition-state energy calculations indicate that Ni-FeS2 and FeS2 show different HER catalytic active center at S and Fe sites, respectively. For Ni-FeS2, this means more H+ preferentially adsorb on S sites for enhanced HER which simultaneously suppresses the competitive reduction of acid corrosion of FeS2 occurred at the same S sites. However, for FeS2 the corrosion reaction and HER occurred, respectively, at S and Fe sites are paralleled. Besides, density functional theory calculations also show that the Ni-FeS2 exhibits the enhanced structural stability during the HER process after Ni2+ doping into FeS2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据