4.6 Article

Oral diazoxide versus placebo for severe or recurrent neonatal hypoglycaemia: Neonatal Glucose Care Optimisation (NeoGluCO) study - a randomised controlled trial

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059452

关键词

neonatology; clinical pharmacology; paediatric endocrinology

资金

  1. University of Auckland (Early Career Research Award)
  2. Health Research Council of New Zealand [20/651]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the efficacy of diazoxide in the treatment of severe or recurrent transitional hypoglycemia in neonates. Diazoxide is administered orally to decrease insulin secretion, and the dosage is adjusted based on the blood glucose range. The primary outcome is the time to resolution of hypoglycemia. This study has been approved by the ethics committee.
Introduction Infants with severe or recurrent transitional hypoglycaemia continue to have high rates of adverse neurological outcomes and new treatment approaches are needed that target the underlying pathophysiology. Diazoxide is one such treatment that acts on the pancreatic beta-cell in a dose-dependent manner to decrease insulin secretion. Methods and analysis Phase IIB, double-blind, two-arm, parallel, randomised trial of diazoxide versus placebo in neonates >= 35 weeks' gestation for treatment of severe (blood glucose concentration (BGC)<1.2 mmol/L or BGC 1.2 to <2.0 mmol/L despite two doses of buccal dextrose gel and feeding in a single episode) or recurrent (>= 3 episodes <2.6 mmol/L in 48 hours) transitional hypoglycaemia. Infants are loaded with diazoxide 5 mg/kg orally and then commenced on a maintenance dose of 1.5 mg/kg every 12 hours, or an equal volume of placebo. The intervention is titrated from the third maintenance dose by protocol to target BGC in the range of 2.6-5.4 mmol/L. The primary outcome is time to resolution of hypoglycaemia, defined as the first point at which the following criteria are met concurrently for >= 24 hours: no intravenous fluids, enteral bolus feeding and normoglycaemia. Groups will be compared for the primary outcome using Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis, expressed as adjusted HR with a 95% CI. Ethics and dissemination This trial has been approved by the Health and Disability Ethics Committees of New Zealand (19CEN189). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, to clinicians and researchers at local and international conferences and to the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据