4.7 Review

Exploring the potential of interleaving to delay catastrophic failure in unidirectional composites under tensile loading

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 100-109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.11.006

关键词

Finite element analysis; Stress concentrations; Stress transfer; Probabilistic methods; Interleaved composite

资金

  1. EPSRC Programme on High Performance Ductile Composite Technology [EP/I02946X/1]
  2. University of Bristol
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I02946X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/I02946X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the potential of interleaving to delay catastrophic translaminar failure in unidirectional Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs) under tensile load. A Finite Element Model of a damaged Polymer Interleaved Composite (PIC) specimen was built by considering an initial translaminar crack in a CFRP ply, and cohesive zones across the neighbouring interleaves and interleaf/CFRP interfaces. Under tensile load, two competing damage processes (delamination and interleaf yielding/cracking) are predicted, leading to different stress concentrations in the neighbouring CFRP plies for different interleaf geometries and material properties. The probability of unstable through-the-thickness crack propagation is then calculated, considering the strength variability of CFRP plies. Results showed that: (i) a high strength variability in CFRP plies leads to a more stable crack propagation in PICs, which can be achieved by using a low number of fibres in each CFRP ply, and (ii) the geometry and mechanical properties of the PIC can be designed to promote controlled delamination, thereby decreasing the stress concentration at the neighbouring plies. The potential of interleaving to delay catastrophic translaminar failure lies in this last aspect, which permits a larger critical cluster of broken fibres than that of classical UD composites. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据