4.2 Article

Trading shallow safety for deep sleep: juvenile green turtles select deeper resting sites as they grow

期刊

ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 61-73

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/esr00750

关键词

Chelonia mydas; Dry Tortugas; Accelerometers; Dive profile; Green turtle

资金

  1. USGS Priority Ecosystem Studies Program
  2. Sea Turtle Grants Program
  3. Florida Sea Turtle License Plate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better protect endangered green sea turtles Chelonia mydas, a more thorough understanding of the behaviors of each life stage is needed. Although dive profile analyses obtained using time-depth loggers have provided some insights into habitat use, recent work has shown that more fine-scale monitoring of body movements is needed to elucidate physical activity patterns. We monitored 11 juvenile green sea turtles with tri-axial acceleration data loggers in their foraging grounds in Dry Tortugas National Park, Florida, USA, for periods ranging from 43 to 118 h (mean +/- SD: 72.8 +/- 27.3 h). Approximately half of the individuals (n = 5) remained in shallow (overall mean depth < 2 m) water throughout the experiment, whereas the remaining individuals (n = 6) made excursions to deeper (4 to 27 m) waters, often at night. Despite these differences in depth use, acceleration data revealed a consistent pattern of diurnal activity and nocturnal resting in most individuals. Nocturnal depth differences thus do not appear to represent differences in behavior, but rather different strategies to achieve the same behavior: rest. We calculated overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) to assess the relative energetic cost of each behavioral strategy in an attempt to explain the differences between them. Animals in deeper water experienced longer resting dives, more time resting per hour, and lower mean hourly ODBA. These results suggest that resting in deeper water provides energetic benefits that outweigh the costs of transiting to deep water and a potential increased risk of predation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据