4.7 Article

Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 208-217

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002

关键词

Cultural ecosystem services; Ecosystem assessment; Theory; Methods; Interdisciplinarity

资金

  1. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On (Work Package 5: Cultural ecosystem services and indicators) - UK Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
  2. Welsh Government
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  4. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  5. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
  6. Arts and Humanities Research Council [AH/I507655/1, AH/J006866/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. AHRC [AH/I507655/1, AH/J006866/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The construction of culture as a class of ecosystem service presents a significant test of the holistic ambitions of an ecosystems approach to decision making. In this paper we explore the theoretical challenges arising from efforts to understand ecosystems as objects of cultural concern and consider the operational complexities associated with understanding how, and with what consequences, knowledge about cultural ecosystem services are created, communicated and accounted for in real world decision making. We specifically forward and develop a conceptual framework for understanding cultural ecosystem services and related benefits in terms of the environmental spaces and cultural practices that arise from interactions between humans and ecosystems. The types of knowledge, and approaches to knowledge production, presumed by this relational, non-linear and place-based perspective on cultural ecosystem services are discussed and reviewed. The framework not only helps navigate more fully the challenge of operationalising 'cultural ecosystem services' but points to a more relational understanding of the ecosystem services framework as a whole. Extending and refining understanding through more ambitious engagements in interdisciplinarity remains important.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据