4.4 Article

A new NCDs@ZIF-90-based sensor: fluorescent turn-on detection of Al3+ ions with high selectivity and sensitivity

期刊

PHOTOCHEMICAL & PHOTOBIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 21, 期 12, 页码 2193-2203

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s43630-022-00288-y

关键词

Carbon dots; Metal-organic framework; Fluorescent sensor; Highselectivity; Al3+

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075040]
  2. Jilin Provincial Department of Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new NCDs@ZIF-90 composite was developed as a fluorescence sensor for selective detection of Al3+. The composite exhibited good chemical and thermal stability, and the fluorescence response had a linear relationship with the concentration of Al3+. The results suggest that NCDs@ZIF-90 has potential as a turn-on fluorescence chemosensor for identifying and detecting Al3+.
A new NCDs@ZIF-90 composite as fluorescence sensor was designed and prepared by encapsulation of N-doped carbon dots (NCDs) in metal-organic framework (MOF) ZIF-90 in one-pot synthesis. NCDs@ZIF-90 retained the crystal structure and high thermal stability of ZIF-90; meanwhile, it also displayed the good chemical stability. NCDs@ZIF-90 dispersion in ethanol exhibited selective turn-on fluorescence response towards Al3+. The other coexisting competing metal ions had no obvious influence on the sensing performance of NCDs@ZIF-90 for Al3+. The fluorescence intensity at 447 nm of NCDs@ ZIF-90 dispersion in ethanol had good linear relation with the concentrations of Al3+ with a low detection limit of 3.196 mu M. The fluorescence enhancement after the addition of Al3+ was attributed to the release of NCDs from the inside of ZIF-90 to ethanol solution. In addition, NCDs@ZIF-90 displayed good recovery in detection of Al3+ in water samples indicating its practical application capability. The high selectivity and sensitivity indicate that NCDs @ZIF-90 is a good candidate as a turn-on fluorescence chemosensor to identify and detect Al-3(+). [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据