4.7 Article

Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 258-269

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.015

关键词

Cultural ecosystem services; Cultural benefits; Subjective well-being indicators; Marine protected areas; Recreation; Non-monetary valuation

资金

  1. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On (Work Package 6: Shared, Plural and Cultural Values) - UK Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
  2. Welsh Government
  3. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  4. Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
  5. Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC)
  6. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation through the Marine Conservation Society
  7. European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [315925]
  8. Scottish Government Rural and Economic Sciences and Analytical Service (RESAS) Division

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The substantial importance of cultural benefits as a source of human well-being is increasingly recognised in society-environment interactions. The integration of cultural ecosystem services (CES) into the ecosystem services framework remains a challenge due to the difficulties associated with defining, articulating and measuring CES. We operationalise a novel framework developed by the UK National Ecosystem Assessment that identifies CES as the interactions between environmental spaces (i.e. physical localities or landscapes), and the activities that occur there. We evaluate the benefits of the CES provided by 151 UK marine sites to recreational sea anglers and divers, using subjective well-being indicators. Factor analysis of an online questionnaire with 1220 participants revealed multiple CES benefits that contribute to human wellbeing e.g. including 'engagement with nature', 'place identity' and 'therapeutic value'. In addition to regional differences, we also found that biophysical attributes of sites, such as the presence of charismatic species and species diversity, were positively associated with provision of CES benefits. The study provides evidence that could be used to inform designation of protected areas. The indicators used in the study may also be adapted for use across a range of marine and terrestrial spaces for improved integration of CES in environmental decision-making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据