4.1 Article

HPLC-MS/MS targeting analysis of phenolics metabolism and antioxidant activity of extractions from Lycium barbarum and its meal using different methods

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA ALIMENTOS
DOI: 10.1590/fst.71022

关键词

Lycium barbarum; meal; HPLC-MS; MS; phenolic compounds; antioxidant

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [JZ2020AKZR0279]
  2. Key research and development projects in Ningxia [2021BEF02013]
  3. Key Research and Development Projects of Anhui Province [202104f06020026, 202004a06020042, 202004a06020052, 201907d06020009]
  4. Youth talent cultivation project of North Minzu University [2021KYQD27, FWNX14]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study contributes to the exploitation of L. barbarum and its meal by comparing the differences in polyphenols of L. barbarum and its meal and exploring the effects of different extraction methods.
The phenolic compounds in dried Lycium barbarum (LB) and L. barbarum meal (LBM) were extracted using ultrasonic method, reflux method and enzymatic method, and the composition, content of polyphenols and antioxidant abilities of the extracts were analyzed. 40 phenolic compounds were identified with HPLC-MS/MS, with 35 compounds detected from LB and 33 from LBM. 40 compounds were classified into phenolic acids and their derivatives, flavonoids, and their derivatives, lignanamides and other phenolic substances. Differences existed in samples extracted from different materials or under different extraction methods. It was explicitly observed that LB was higher than LBM in phenolic content. The phenolics in LB and LBM had significant antioxidant effects, with LBM extracts showing the higher antioxidant effect. This study compared the differences in polyphenols of L. barbarum and its meal, meanwhile explored the effects of different extraction methods, which could contribute to the exploitation of L. barbarum and its meal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据