3.8 Article

Video head impulse testing to differentiate vestibular neuritis from posterior circulation stroke in the emergency department: a prospective observational study

期刊

BMJ NEUROLOGY OPEN
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjno-2022-000284

关键词

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; NEUROOTOLOGY; STROKE; VERTIGO

资金

  1. Sydney South West Local Health District
  2. Sydney South West Local Health District, Health Beyond Research Innovation Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the use of video Head Impulse Test (v-HIT) combined with Head Impulse, Nystagmus, and Test of Skew (HINTs) as a reliable tool to differentiate between vestibular neuritis (VN) and posterior circulation stroke (PCS) in acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) cases in the emergency department (ED).
Background and aims Vertigo is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED) with 5% of presentations due to posterior circulation stroke (PCS). Bedside investigations such as the head impulse test (HIT) are used to risk stratify patients, but interpretation is operator dependent. The video HIT (v-HIT) provides objective measurement of the vestibular-ocular-reflex (VOR) and may improve diagnostic accuracy in acute vestibular syndrome (AVS). We aimed to evaluate the use of v-HIT as an adjunct to clinical assessment to acutely differentiate vestibular neuritis (VN) from PCS. Methods 133 patients with AVS were consecutively enrolled from the ED of our comprehensive stroke centre between 2018 and 2021. Patient assessment included a targeted vestibular history, HINTs examination (Head Impulse, Nystagmus and Test of Skew), v-HIT and MRI>48 hours after symptom onset. The HINTS/v-HIT findings were analysed and compared between VN, PCS and other cause AVS. Clinical course, v-HIT and MRI findings were used to determine diagnosis. Results Final diagnosis was VN in 40%, PCS 15%, migraine 16% and other cause AVS 29%. PCS patients were older than VN patients (mean age 68.5 +/- 10.6 vs 60.1 +/- 14.2 years, p=0.14) and had more cardiovascular risk factors (3 vs 2, p=0.002). Mean VOR gain was reduced (<0.8) in ipsilateral horizontal and (<0.7) anterior canals in VN but was normal in PCS, migraine and other cause AVS. V-HIT combined with HINTs was 89% sensitive and 96% specific for a diagnosis of VN. Conclusions V-HIT combined with HINTs is a reliable tool to exclude PCS in the ED.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据