4.2 Article

Agomelatine versus Sertraline: An Observational, Open-labeled and 12 Weeks Follow-up Study on Efficacy and Tolerability

期刊

出版社

KOREAN COLL NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.9758/cpn.2016.14.4.351

关键词

Agomelatine; Sertraline; Clinical efficacy; Drug tolerance; Comparative study

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: In this open labeled, 12 weeks follow up study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine with sertraline Methods: The outpatients of adult psychiatry clinic who have a new onset of depression and diagnosed as 'major depressive episode' by clinician according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition and prescribed agomela-tine (25 mg/day) or sertraline (50 mg/day) were included in the study. Results: The decline of. mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores of agomelatine group was significantly higher than the sertraline group at the end of 2nd week; however, the difference was not significant at the end of. 3 months. Mean Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale (CGI-I) scores of agomelatine group was lower than sertraline group at first week. Mean CGI Severity scale and CGI-I scores were favour to sertraline group at the end of the study. Remission rates were 46.7% for sertraline group and 33.3% for agomelatine group while response rates were 76.7% for both groups. Any patient from agomelatine group dropped out due to adverse effects. The amount of side effects was also less with agomelatine. Conclusion: Agomelatine has a rapid onset efficacy on depressive symptoms and this can be beneficial for some critical cases. Considering MADRS scores, agomelatine seems to have similar efficacy with sertraline but we also point the need for long term studies since CGI scores were favour to sertraline group at the end of the study. Agomelatine has a favourable tolerability profile both in terms of discontinuation and the amount of side effects compared to sertraline.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据