3.8 Article

Interfacial cavitation

期刊

PNAS NEXUS
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac217

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research Program Manager [N00014-20-1-2561]
  2. National Science Foundation [1942016]
  3. Burroughs Welcome Fund
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences at the National Institutes of Health [DP2GM146253]
  5. Saint-Gobain through the Center for UMass/Industry Research on Polymers (CUMIRP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals interfacial cavitation as a previously unconsidered failure mechanism and provides experimental evidence confirming its prevalence in both natural and synthetic material systems. The research demonstrates interfacial cavitation phenomena at two different length scales through experimental observation and theoretical model, highlighting the competition between bulk and interfacial cavitation modes.
Cavitation has long been recognized as a crucial predictor, or precursor, to the ultimate failure of various materials, ranging from ductile metals to soft and biological materials. Traditionally, cavitation in solids is defined as an unstable expansion of a void or a defect within a material. The critical applied load needed to trigger this instability -- the critical pressure -- is a lengthscale independent material property and has been predicted by numerous theoretical studies for a breadth of constitutive models. While these studies usually assume that cavitation initiates from defects in the bulk of an otherwise homogeneous medium, an alternative and potentially more ubiquitous scenario can occur if the defects are found at interfaces between two distinct media within the body. Such interfaces are becoming increasingly common in modern materials with the use of multimaterial composites and layer-by-layer additive manufacturing methods. However, a criterion to determine the threshold for interfacial failure, in analogy to the bulk cavitation limit, has yet to be reported. In this work, we fill this gap. Our theoretical model captures a lengthscale independent limit for interfacial cavitation, and is shown to agree with our observations at two distinct lengthscales, via two different experimental systems. To further understand the competition between the two cavitation modes (bulk versus interface), we expand our investigation beyond the elastic response to understand the ensuing unstable propagation of delamination at the interface. A phase diagram summarizes these results, showing regimes in which interfacial failure becomes the dominant mechanism. Significance Statement: A fundamental question when working with any solid material is: when will it fail? In this work, we report a hitherto unconsidered failure mechanism interfacial cavitation and provide experimental proof to confirm that it is prevalent in both natural and synthetic material systems. Though cavitation that initiates from defects in the bulk has been documented in solids since the 50s and is by now established as a primary mode of failure initiation in a wide range of solids, from hard metals to soft and biological materials, a criterion to determine an analogous scale-free threshold for interfacial cavitation has yet to be reported. In this work, we fill this gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据