3.8 Article

Advantages of binary stochastic synapses for hardware spiking neural networks with realistic memristors

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2634-4386/ac7c89

关键词

spiking neural networks; binary; stochastic; MNIST; memristor

资金

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) project [SM21-0008]
  2. Swedish Research Counsel (VR) project [2018-05379]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2018-05379] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research finds that binary stochastic spiking neural networks (SNNs) can outperform analog deterministic SNNs when considering realistic memristors, particularly in situations with considerable device noise. Binary stochastic SNNs also require fewer weight updates to train, leading to superior utilization of the limited endurance in realistic memristive devices.
Hardware implementing spiking neural networks (SNNs) has the potential to provide transformative gains in energy efficiency and throughput for energy-restricted machine-learning tasks. This is enabled by large arrays of memristive synapse devices that can be realized by various emerging memory technologies. But in practice, the performance of such hardware is limited by non-ideal features of the memristor devices such as nonlinear and asymmetric state updates, limited bit-resolution, limited cycling endurance and device noise. Here we investigate how stochastic switching in binary synapses can provide advantages compared with realistic analog memristors when using unsupervised training of SNNs via spike timing-dependent plasticity. We find that the performance of binary stochastic SNNs is similar to or even better than analog deterministic SNNs when one considers memristors with realistic bit-resolution as well in situations with considerable cycle-to-cycle noise. Furthermore, binary stochastic SNNs require many fewer weight updates to train, leading to superior utilization of the limited endurance in realistic memristive devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据