4.7 Article

THMS-Net: A Two-Stage Heterogeneous Signals Mutual Supervision Network for MFL Weak Defect Detection

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2022.3198762

关键词

Improved nonmaximum suppression (NMS); magnetic flux leakage (MFL); mutual supervision; weak defect detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61627809, 61973071]
  2. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC2002046]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [N2104020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method based on a two-stage heterogeneous signals mutual supervision network is proposed for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) weak defect detection, improving the discrimination between defect and nondefect signals by enhancing their mutual supervision.
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing is an effective method of pipeline defect detection to guarantee the health of submarine pipelines. However, due to the interference of strong defect signals and complex nondefect signals, the detection of MFL weak defects is a tough issue currently. Focusing on this problem, an MFL weak defect detection method based on two-stage heterogeneous signals mutual supervision network (THMS-Net) is proposed. THMS-Net includes two deep networks for the feature extraction of heterogeneous MFL axial and radial signals, and the mutual supervision of them enhances the discrimination between the defect and nondefect signals. There are two stages in the training phase of THMS-Net. The first stage is to approximate the outputs of THMS-Net with heterogeneous defect inputs, and the second stage is to extend the outputs of THMS-Net with heterogeneous nondefect inputs. THMS-Net establishes a potential relationship between heterogeneous signals through the mutual supervision of defect samples and nondefect samples for the first time. Additionally, an improved nonmaximum suppression (NMS) on external features is proposed to refine defect detection. Finally, the experiments are conducted to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据