4.5 Article

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Patient Safety Culture: A Cross-Sectional Study among Community Pharmacies in Jordan

期刊

HEALTHCARE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10081434

关键词

COVID-19; patient safety culture; community pharmacy; healthcare quality; pharmaceutical care; Jordan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the patient safety culture among community pharmacies in Jordan during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed an overall positive patient safety culture, but issues were observed in staffing, work pressure, and pace.
The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically imposed stressful conditions that may impact the ability of healthcare staff to provide safe and effective care. Research on patient safety culture among community pharmacies during the pandemic is limited. This study aimed to assess the patient safety culture among community pharmacies in Jordan during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pharmacists and pharmacy assistants from 450 community pharmacies were approached through online means, with 378 answering the questionnaire written in Arabic that had been adapted from the Community Pharmacy Survey on Patient Safety Culture (PSOPSC). This study showed that various patient safety standards were addressed to a high degree during the COVID-19 pandemic, as represented by the high positive response rate (PRR) measures that were mainly observed in the dimensions Teamwork (90.1%), Patient Counseling (85.2%), and Staff Training and Skills (82.7%). Furthermore, significantly higher PRR scores for the Teamwork, Staffing, Work Pressure, and Pace, Response to Mistakes, Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement, and Overall Perceptions of Patient Safety dimensions were observed among participants who worked in independent pharmacies than those who worked in chain pharmacies. Despite an overall positive patient safety culture in the current context of community pharmacies in Jordan during the COVID-19 pandemic, pitfalls were observed in the Staffing, Work Pressure, and Pace dimension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据