4.7 Article

Morphological study of dynamic culture of thermosensitive collagen hydrogel in constructing tissue engineering complex

期刊

BIOENGINEERED
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 266-273

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1197741

关键词

dynamic culture; extracellular matrix; seed cells; scaffold; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province, China [20160101105JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to research the morphologies and functional characteristics of the cell-scaffold complex in vitro constructed under dynamic culture conditions. BMSCs were isolated from the long bones of Fischer344 rats, and performed in vitro amplification to the third generation as seed cells, together with thermosensitive collagen hydrogel (TCH) as cell adhesion matrix, and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) as scaffold, to construct cell-scaffold complex. The cell-scaffold complexes in the experiment group and the control group were then performed dynamic culture and static culture. After 7 d of in vitro culture, the complexes in the 2 groups were performed gross observation and SEM; meanwhile, the total DNA content in the complex was detected on D0,1,3, and 7 of culture. After cultured using these 2 ways, collagen could both wrap the PLLA scaffold, forming dense film-like structures on the PLLA surface. The total DNA contents in the cell-scaffold complex of the experiment group on D1,3, and 7 were significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with D0, the total DNA contents on D1,3, and 7 in both groups were gradually increased, but only the total DNA contents on D7 showed statistically significant difference than D0 (P < 0.05). TCH -PLLA fiber joint-constructed complex extracellular matrix had good biocompatibility, and dynamic culture could promote the distribution of BMSCs on the surface and inside the structure, thus promoting cell proliferation, so it could be used for the in vitro construction of tissue engineering complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据