4.6 Article

HexFire: A Flexible and Accessible Wildfire Simulator

期刊

LAND
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land11081288

关键词

fire model; fire simulation; fire management; fire impacts; HexSim; HexFire

资金

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As fire frequency and severity increase worldwide, scientists need to incorporate wildfire models into their research, but existing simulators are complex and difficult to use. Therefore, we introduce a user-friendly wildfire simulator, HexFire, designed for non-specialist investigators, and provide a detailed description of its design and mechanisms.
As fire frequency and severity grow throughout the world, scientists working across a range of disciplines will increasingly need to incorporate wildfire models into their research. However, fire simulators tend to be highly complex, time-consuming to learn, and difficult to parameterize. As a result, embracing these models can prove impractical for scientists and practitioners who are not fire specialists. Here we introduce a parsimonious wildfire simulator named HexFire that has been designed for rapid uptake by investigators who do not specialize in the mechanics of fire spread. HexFire should be useful to such nonspecialists for representing the spread of fire, interactions with fuel breaks, and for integrating wildfire into other types of ecological models. We provide a detailed description of the HexFire simulator's design and mechanisms. Our heuristic fire spread examples highlight the flexibility inherent in the model system, demonstrate that HexFire can generate a wide range of emergent fire behaviors, and illustrate how HexFire might be coupled with other environmental models. We also describe ways that HexFire itself might be altered or augmented. HexFire can be used as a proxy for more detailed fire simulators and to assess the implications of wildfire for local ecological systems. HexFire can also simulate fire interactions with fuel breaks and active fire suppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据