3.9 Review

An Analysis of the Differences in Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Review of Rural and Urban Areas in South Africa

期刊

CLIMATE
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cli10080118

关键词

exposure; sensitivity; adaptive capacity; climate change; rural and urban areas; differences in vulnerability; South Africa

资金

  1. SAF-ADAPT project by the African Climate Development Initiative (ACDI) at the University of Cape Town
  2. Risk and Vulnerability Science Centre at the University of Fort Hare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The vulnerability to climate change varies between rural and urban areas in South Africa due to differences in climate change drivers, infrastructure orientation, typical livelihood, and income-generating activities. This study highlights the importance of conducting place-based vulnerability analyses and promoting localized interventions for enhancing adaptation processes.
Evidence is unequivocal that rural and urban areas in South Africa are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change; however, impacts are felt disproportionately. This difference in vulnerability between rural and urban areas is presently unclear to guide context-based climate policies and frameworks to enhance adaptation processes. A clear understanding of the differences in vulnerability to climate change between rural and urban areas is pertinent. This systematic review aimed to explore how vulnerability to climate change varies between rural and urban areas and what explains these variations. The approach was guided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change vulnerability framework incorporating exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity dimensions integrated into the Sustainable Livelihood Framework. The review used 30 articles based on the search criteria developed. The findings show differences in vulnerability to climate change between rural and urban areas owing to several factors that distinguish rural from urban areas, such as differences in climate change drivers, infrastructure orientation, typical livelihood, and income-generating activities. We conclude that vulnerability varies with location and requires place-based analyses. Instead of blanket policy recommendations, localized interventions that enhance adaptation in specific rural and urban areas should be promoted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据