4.1 Article

Fossil evidence for earlier radiation in istiophorid billfishes (Teleostei, Istiophoriformes) uncovered by comparative morphology of the caudal vertebrae

期刊

JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2022.2100709

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Secretary of Science and Technology of Panama [APY-NI10-016A, BIP-2018-004]
  2. Ricardo Perez S.A
  3. STRI-Tupper Paleontological Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compares the caudal vertebral morphology of extant istiophorid species and describes two fossil vertebrae from the late Miocene of Panama. The results indicate the presence of Makaira sp. and taxa lacking lateral apophyses during the late Miocene, suggesting that the radiation of istiophorids occurred before the Pliocene.
Billfishes include some of the largest pelagic teleostean species, but several aspects about their morphology, paleobiology, and evolution remain ambiguous. Their fossil record is fragmentary and mostly represented by rostral and skull remains. Here, we present a comparative study of the caudal vertebral morphology of extant istiophorid species and we use this information to describe two fossil vertebrae from the Gatun and Chagres formations, both from the late Miocene of Panama. The caudal vertebra from the Gatun Fm. is characterized by the presence of a lateral apophysis and identified as Makaira sp., while the vertebra from the Rio Indio Member of Chagres Fm. lacks this structure and its morphology indicates a different genus. The estimated total length of the Makaira sp. specimen from Gatun Fm. is about 5.18 m, the largest size calculated for a marlin, while the Rio Indio specimen was about 2.56 m long. Phylogenies show that the radiation of most living istiophorid species seemingly occurred during the Pliocene. However, our results highlight that the genus Makaira and the taxa lacking the lateral apophyses occurred during the late Miocene, showing that the radiation of istiophorids most likely occurred before the Pliocene (ca. 5 Ma).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据