4.7 Review

In Vitro Propagation of Caper (Capparis spinosa L.): A Review

期刊

HORTICULTURAE
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8080737

关键词

caper; in vitro germination; microcuttings; micropropagation; organogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caper is a shrubby plant species that is difficult to propagate by seeds or vegetative means. Tissue culture methods could be a potential solution to overcome these limitations. This review provides an overview of the conventional propagation methods of caper and highlights the potential of micropropagation methods in overcoming obstacles and genetic improvement.
Caper (Capparis spinosa L.) is a shrubby plant species recalcitrant to vegetative propagation and generally difficult to propagate by seeds. This is due to the difficulties associated with seed germination, root induction from stem cuttings, and plant hardening. Propagation by tissue culture would be a good alternative and promising approach to overcome the limitations of conventional propagation. Tissue culture methods can be used for the clonal propagation of caper plants. Indeed, in many plant species, micropropagation has played a decisive role in the rapid and large-scale production of uniform and genetically stable plants. Tissue culture methods can also be used in genetic improvement and conservation programs. In this review, we first provided an overview on caper and its conventional means of propagation, then we described the different methods of caper micropropagation, i.e., in vitro seed germination and seedling development, propagation by nodal segmentation of elongated shoots (i.e., microcuttings), and adventitious organogenesis. These micropropagation methods can make it possible to overcome all the obstacles preventing large-scale propagation and genetic improvement of caper. Thus, the most updated information on the progress made in the field of caper micropropagation is reported and future perspectives are outlined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据