4.5 Article

The UK Met Office global circulation model with a sophisticated radiation scheme applied to the hot Jupiter HD 209458b

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 595, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629183

关键词

planets and satellites: gaseous planets; planets and satellites: atmospheres; methods: numerical; radiative transfer; hydrodynamics

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7 Grant) [247060-PEPS, 320478-TOFU]
  2. NASA Astrobiology Program through the Nexus for Exoplanet System Science
  3. Leverhulme Trust
  4. Met Office Academic Partnership secondment
  5. DFG through the Collaborative Research Centre The Milky Way System [SFB 881]
  6. STFC
  7. Large Facilities Capital Fund of BIS
  8. University of Exeter
  9. STFC [ST/K000373/1, ST/H008535/1, ST/M006948/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000373/1, ST/M006948/1, ST/H008535/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study the complexity of hot Jupiter atmospheres revealed by observations of increasing quality, we have adapted the UK Met Office Global Circulation Model (GCM), the Unified Model (UM), to these exoplanets. The UM solves the full 3D Navier-Stokes equations with a height-varying gravity, avoiding the simplifications used in most GCMs currently applied to exoplanets. In this work we present the coupling of the UM dynamical core to an accurate radiation scheme based on the two-stream approximation and correlated-k method with state-of-the-art opacities from ExoMol. Our first application of this model is devoted to the extensively studied hot Jupiter HD 209458b. We have derived synthetic emission spectra and phase curves, and compare them to both previous models also based on state-of-the-art radiative transfer, and to observations. We find a reasonable agreement between observations and both our days side emission and hot spot offset, however, our night side emissions is too large. Overall our results are qualitatively similar to those found by Showman et al. (2009, ApJ, 699, 564) with the SPARC/MITgcm, however, we note several quantitative differences: Our simulations show significant variation in the position of the hottest part of the atmosphere with pressure, as expected from simple timescale arguments, and in contrast to the vertical coherency found by Showman et al. (2009). We also see significant quantitative differences in calculated synthetic observations. Our comparisons strengthen the need for detailed intercomparisons of dynamical cores, radiation schemes and post-processing tools to understand these differences. This effort is necessary in order to make robust conclusions about these atmospheres based on GCM results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据