4.5 Article

Mapping Growth-Related Quantitative Trait Locus (QTL) in Commercial Yellow River Carp (Cyprinus carpio haematopterus) during Overwintering

期刊

FISHES
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/fishes7040166

关键词

Cyprinus carpio haematopterus; overwintering; growth; quantitative trait locus (QTL); candidate gene

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31602149]
  2. major public welfare projects in Henan Province [201300311300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explores the genetic regulation mechanism of overwintering growth in Yellow River carp, identifying growth-related QTLs and candidate genes associated with biological activities. These findings provide valuable references for breeding and genetic selection of Yellow River carp.
The common carp (Cyprinus carpio) is farmed globally; as a subspecies, the Yellow River carp (C. c. haematopterus) is widely farmed in northern China. Since the Yellow River carp grows slowly in winter, it would benefit breeders to implement a breeding program targeting growth in winter. In May 2017, we established a Yellow River carp family and measured the body length, height, thickness, and weight of individuals before (October 2017) and after winter (February 2018). Based on the genetic linkage map established in our laboratory, the quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping of these four traits led to the detection of 29 growth-related QTLs, of which 9, 7, 3, and 10 QTLs were associated with body length, height, thickness, and body weight, respectively. One consensus QTL contained seven QTLs associated with four traits. Through the two major-effect QTLs (qBL-p-1 and qBL-p-2), we screened three candidate genes (fnd3b, ghsr, and pld1), which were associated with biological activities, such as fat formation, growth, and membrane transport. These results are helpful in exploring the growth regulation mechanism and providing a reference for genetic breeding with regard to the overwintering growth of Yellow River carp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据