4.5 Article

Formation of dust-rich planetesimals from sublimated pebbles inside of the snow line

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 596, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629680

关键词

planets and satellites: formation; planet-disk interactions; accretion, accretion disks

资金

  1. OCA BQR
  2. MEXT Kakenhi [15H02065]
  3. French ANR projet MOJO (Modeling the Origin of JOvian planets) [ANR-13-13-BS05-0003-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context. For up to a few millions of years, pebbles must provide a quasi-steady inflow of solids from the outer parts of protoplanetary disks to their inner regions. Aims. We wish to understand how a significant fraction of the pebbles grows into planetesimals instead of being lost to the host star. Methods. We examined analytically how the inward flow of pebbles is a ffected by the snow line and under which conditions dust-rich (rocky) planetesimals form. When calculating the inward drift of solids that is due to gas drag, we included the back-reaction of the gas to the motion of the solids. Results. We show that in low-viscosity protoplanetary disks (with a monotonous surface density similar to that of the minimum-mass solar nebula), the flow of pebbles does not usually reach the required surface density to form planetesimals by streaming instability. We show, however, that if the pebble-to-gas-mass flux exceeds a critical value, no steady solution can be found for the solid-to-gas ratio. This is particularly important for low-viscosity disks (alpha < 10(-3)) where we show that inside of the snow line, silicate-dust grains ejected from sublimating pebbles can accumulate, eventually leading to the formation of dust-rich planetesimals directly by gravitational instability. Conclusions. This formation of dust-rich planetesimals may occur for extended periods of time, while the snow line sweeps from several au to inside of 1 au. The rock-to-ice ratio may thus be globally significantly higher in planetesimals and planets than in the central star.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据