4.6 Article

Bio-Inspired Neural Network-Based Optimal Path Planning for UUVs Under the Effect of Ocean Currents

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 231-239

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIV.2021.3082151

关键词

Neurons; Biological neural networks; Path planning; Oceans; Three-dimensional displays; Solid modeling; Planning; Current effect; neural network; optimal path planning; unmanned underwater vehicle

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An intelligent algorithm for unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) is proposed in this paper to address the optimal path in the underwater environment without being affected by ocean currents. The algorithm consists of a neural network-based algorithm for deducing the shortest path and avoiding collisions, and an adjusting component for balancing the deviation caused by ocean currents. The optimization results of the proposed algorithm are presented and compared with a path planning algorithm that does not consider the effect of currents. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method when encountering currents of different directions and velocities.
To eliminate the effect of ocean currents when addressing the optimal path in the underwater environment, an intelligent algorithm designed for the unmanned underwater vehicle (UUV) is proposed in this paper. The algorithm consists of two parts: a neural network-based algorithm that deducts the shortest path and avoids all possible collisions; and an adjusting component that balances off the deviation brought by the effect of ocean currents. The optimization results of the proposed algorithm are presented in details, and compared with the path planning algorithm that does not consider the effect of currents. Results of the comparison prove the effectiveness of the path planning method when encountering currents of different directions and velocities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据