4.5 Article

Toward gas exhaustion in the W51 high-mass protoclusters

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 595, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628318

关键词

H II regions; circumstellar matter; radio continuum: ISM; radio lines: ISM; stars: massive; stars: protostars

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [KR4801/1-1]
  2. STFC [ST/N00485X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present new JVLA observations of the high-mass cluster-forming region W51A from 2 to 16 GHz with resolution theta(fwhm) approximate to 0.3-0.5 ''. The data reveal a wealth of observational results: (1) Currently forming, very massive (proto-O) stars are traced by o-H2CO 2(1,1)-2(1,2) emission, suggesting that this line can be used efficiently as a massive protostar tracer; (2) there is a spatially distributed population of. less than or similar to mJy continuum sources, including hypercompact H II regions and candidate colliding wind binaries, in and around the W51 proto-clusters; and (3) there are two clearly detected protoclusters, W51e and W51 IRS2, that are gas-rich but may have most of their mass in stars within their inner. 0.05 pc. The majority of the bolometric luminosity in W51 most likely comes from a third population of OB stars between these clusters. The presence of a substantial population of exposed O-stars coincident with a population of still-forming massive stars, together with a direct measurement of the low mass loss rate via ionized gas outflow from W51 IRS2, implies that feedback is ineffective at halting star formation in massive protoclusters. Instead, feedback may shut off the large-scale accretion of diffuse gas onto the W51 protoclusters, implying that they are evolving toward a state of gas exhaustion rather than gas expulsion. Recent theoretical models predict gas exhaustion to be a necessary step in the formation of gravitationally bound stellar clusters, and our results provide an observational validation of this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据