4.2 Article

A fluorescent Ce-EDTA probe for the sensing of ascorbic acid and lysine in real samples

期刊

MATERIALS ADVANCES
卷 3, 期 21, 页码 7925-7936

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ma00477a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India [09/1217(0051)/2018-EMR-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, a fluorescent probe based on Ce-EDTA coordination complex was developed for sensing carboxyl compounds. Ce-EDTA was synthesized using a hydrothermal method and characterized by FT-IR, XPS, and UV-visible spectroscopy. The probe showed high sensitivity and selectivity towards Lys and AA, and could be applied for their detection in real samples as well.
In the present work, a fluorescent probe based on an aqueous dispersion of coordination complex Ce-EDTA is utilized for sensing carboxyl compounds. Ce-EDTA is synthesized herein by a hydrothermal method with the help of stoichiometric ratios of cerium (Ce) (+iii) salts and green ligand ethylenediamine N,N,N,N tetra-acetic acid (EDTA). In Ce-EDTA, the Ce ion is surrounded by hexadentate EDTA and three labile aqua ligands, evidenced by FT-IR, XPS, and UV-visible spectroscopy. It exists in the form of polygonal microplates, as apparent by SEM. The sensing mechanism is proposed by choosing carboxyl groups as a part of the ring and open chain. Under the optimized situations, the fluorescence intensities of Ce-EDTA are monitored towards various concentrations of l-lysine (Lys) and ascorbic acid (AA) in these regards. They exhibit a linear response from 20.29 mu M to 251.74 mu M and 5.62 mu M to 60.87 mu M with a linear correlation coefficient (R-2) of 0.98 and 0.99, respectively. The lower limit of detection is observed as 3.6 mu M in the case of Lys and 2.04 mu M in the case of AA. The as-prepared probe exhibits suitability for selectivity of AA and Lys in the presence of various interfering agents as well as in real samples for the detection of AA in orange and Lys in soybean seed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据