4.7 Article

UAV Relayed Covert Wireless Networks: Expand Hiding Range via Drones

期刊

IEEE NETWORK
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 226-232

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/MNET.104.2100496

关键词

Relays; Wireless networks; Autonomous aerial vehicles; Uncertainty; Communication system security; Radio transmitters; Security

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the use of covert communication as a wireless technique to hide confidential information and proposes the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) as relays to improve the quality of service in covert wireless networks. The article introduces several typical application scenarios and presents two scenarios where UAVs serve as relays. The effectiveness and superiority of the proposed schemes are evaluated through simulation results, and future challenges are discussed.
Covert communication has emerged as a revolutionary wireless technique to hide confidential information -- either naturally or via artificial noise -- from being detected. Random transmit power, time-variant channel state information, and location mobility can be leveraged to confuse the detection at the warden. However, it becomes challenging when the distance is long or the direct link is blocked. In this article, we explore an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) as the relay to assist covert wireless networks to achieve better quality of service. First, several typical application scenarios are demonstrated and briefly discussed. Then, two scenarios of UAVs serving as a relay in covert wireless networks are narrated. The first case investigates a multi-antenna transmitter aided by a drone relay in the long-range covert wireless network against the detection of a UAV warden. The second case studies the covert wireless network assisted by a UAV relay to overcome the channel blockage problem. Simulation results are provided to evaluate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed schemes. Finally, some future challenges are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据