4.5 Article

Cannibals in the thick disk: the young α-rich stars as evolved blue stragglers

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 595, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629356

关键词

stars: evolution; blue stragglers; Galaxy: stellar content; binaries: general; binaries: spectroscopic

资金

  1. European Union FP7 programme through ERC [320360]
  2. King's College Cambridge
  3. Marshall Scholarship
  4. King's College Cambridge Studenship
  5. STFC
  6. Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgium
  7. Research Council of KU Leuven, Belgium
  8. Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (F.R.S. FNRS), Belgium
  9. Royal Observatory of Belgium
  10. Observatoire de Geneve, Switzerland
  11. Thuringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Germany
  12. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L003910/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  13. STFC [ST/L003910/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spectro-seismic measurements of red giants enabled the recent discovery of stars in the thick disk that are more massive than 1.4 M-circle dot. While it has been claimed that most of these stars are younger than the rest of the typical thick disk stars, we show evidence that they might be products of mass transfer in binary evolution, notably evolved blue stragglers. We took new measurements of the radial velocities in a sample of 26 stars from APOKASC, including 13 young stars and 13 old stars with similar stellar parameters but with masses below 1.2 M-circle dot and found that more of the young stars appear to be in binary systems with respect to the old stars. Furthermore, we show that the young stars do not follow the expected trend of [C/H] ratios versus mass for individual stars. However, with a population synthesis of low-mass stars including binary evolution and mass transfer, we can reproduce the observed [C/N] ratios versus mass. Our study shows how asteroseismology of solar-type red giants provides us with a unique opportunity to study the evolution of field blue stragglers after they have left the main-sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据