4.7 Article

Cellulosic fibers from rice straw and bamboo used as reinforcement of cement-based composites for remarkably improving mechanical properties

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 153-161

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.086

关键词

Fibers; Physical properties; Mechanical properties; Cement-based composites

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011BAE11B01]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303151]
  3. Entrepreneurial Talents of Science and Technology Planning Projects of Sichuan Province [2013RZ0036]
  4. Open Project of State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base for Nonmetal Composites and Functional Materials [11zxfk26]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cement-based composites reinforced with cellulosic fibers isolated from rice straw were fabricated by a slurry vacuum de-watering technique. The physical structures and mechanical properties of the composites with fiber contents ranging from 2% to 16% by weight (wt.%) were investigated. Moreover, the composites reinforced with bamboo cellulosic fibers and the control cement paste, sample without cellulosic fibers, were also fabricated as reference materials. As a result, the cement-based composites reinforced by cellulosic fibers showed a remarkable improvement in the mechanical properties. The measurements of the flexural strength and the fracture toughness of the optimal sample were found to be increased by 24.3% and 45 times, respectively. The bulk density of the composites was decreased by 12.4-37.3% as a result of the introduction of cellulosic fibers. Additionally, the field emission scanning electron microscope (FSEM) observations and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analyses revealed that the hydration products of Portland cement migrated to the fiber lumens, resulting in mineralizing the cellulosic fibers and decreasing the fracture toughness of the composites. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据