4.6 Article

Single-site, Ni-modified Wells-Dawson-type polyoxometalate for propylene dimerization

期刊

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 19, 页码 5970-5981

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy01065h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under NSF [EEC-1647722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a catalyst consisting of isolated Ni2+ sites on a lacunary defect of a Wells-Dawson polyoxometalate supported on SBA-15 was used for gas phase propylene oligomerization. The catalyst exhibited high selectivity for linear propylene dimers and depended on reaction temperature.
Olefin oligomerization is an essential step in the production of liquid fuels, chemicals, and chemical precursors. Here, we report gas phase propylene oligomerization catalyzed by isolated Ni2+ sites substituted on the lacunary defect of a Wells-Dawson polyoxometalate (K8P2W17O61 center dot Ni2+) supported on SBA-15 (Ni-POM-WD/SBA-15). The Ni-POM-WD/SBA-15 catalyst exhibited high product selectivity for linear propylene dimers (>76%) relative to branched propylene dimers (<24%). The linear dimer selectivity was independent of the overall propylene conversion between 0.6-5% but was dependent on reaction temperature. The propylene dimerization activation energy was measured as 44.5 kJ mol(-1), which is consistent with the reported values for Ni2+ exchanged-zeolites for propylene oligomerization. Further, the measured dimerization reaction rate order was a strong function of the initial propylene partial pressure and transitioned from second order to first order at higher propylene partial pressures. The catalyst was fully regenerated after reaction by applying a thermal regeneration step in helium. Transient, time-on-stream catalyst performance measurements showed the catalyst had a mean life of similar to 0.6-1.15 h during three reaction cycles and had a slightly increased initial propylene consumption rate with each cycle.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据