4.6 Review

Connecting Urban Green Spaces with Children: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace

期刊

LAND
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land11081259

关键词

urban green space (UGS); children; CiteSpace; scientometric; visualization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a quantitative analysis of publications related to urban green spaces (UGS) and children, revealing a rapid increase in the number of publications in this field in recent years. The findings offer a preliminary understanding of this field and suggest that collaboration and analysis involving multiple disciplines and perspectives will become a mainstream trend.
In recent years, the interaction between urban green spaces (UGS) and children has been a popular direction in research on child-friendly cities. Keeping up with emerging trends and key turning points in the development of collective knowledge is crucial. In this study, a quantitative analysis of publications related to UGS and children published in the Web of Science (WoS) core collection between 1980 and February 2022 was conducted by means of scientometric methods. Then, it using CiteSpace (5. 8. R3, Chaomei Chen, Philadelphia, the U.S.) to visualize collaborative networks, co-citation networks, document clustering, and bursts of keywords in the database literature. The study results show a rapid increase in the number of publications in this field in recent years. The main driving forces in these studies were from the United States (262 publications), China (68), and Australia (65). A scientometric analysis of the literature on UGS and children's studies provides a unique and exciting snapshot of this field of knowledge. The findings offer the readers a general preliminary grasp of the research in the field. Research findings suggest that collaboration and analysis involving multiple disciplines, specialties, and perspectives will become a mainstream trend in the field. Our results may help researchers further identify potential views on collaborators, research frontiers, and topical issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据