4.1 Article

The All of Us Research Program: Data quality, utility, and diversity

期刊

PATTERNS
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100570

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director [1 OT2 OD026549, 1 OT2 OD026554, 1 OT2 OD026557, 1 OT2 OD026556, 1 OT2 OD026550, 1 OT2 OD 026552, 1 OT2 OD026553, 1 OT2 OD026548, 1 OT2 OD026551, 1 OT2 OD026555, AOD 16037, HHSN 263201600085U]
  2. The National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director [5 U2C OD023196, 1 U24 OD023121, U24 OD023176, 1 U24 OD023163, 3 OT2 OD023205, 3 OT2 OD023206, 1 OT2 OD025277, 3 OT2 OD025315, 1 OT2 OD025337, 1 OT2 OD025276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The All of Us Research Program aims to democratize access to analytical tools and participant information through a cloud-based Researcher Workbench, advancing precision medicine research. Validation study findings demonstrate the successful replication of various complex diseases in 315,000 participants and the inclusion of historically underrepresented groups in biomedical research.
The All of Us Research Program seeks to engage at least one million diverse participants to advance precision medicine and improve human health. We describe here the cloud-based Researcher Workbench that uses a data passport model to democratize access to analytical tools and participant information including survey, physical measurement, and electronic health record (EHR) data. We also present validation study findings for several common complex diseases to demonstrate use of this novel platform in 315,000 participants, 78% of whom are from groups historically underrepresented in biomedical research, including 49% self-reporting non-White races. Replication findings include medication usage pattern differences by race in depression and type 2 diabetes, validation of known cancer associations with smoking, and calculation of cardiovascular risk scores by reported race effects. The cloud-based Researcher Workbench represents an important advance in enabling secure access for a broad range of researchers to this large resource and analytical tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据