4.4 Article

Ambulatory blood pressure trajectories and blood pressure variability in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative study against chronic kidney disease patients

期刊

KIDNEY RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 482-491

出版社

KOREAN SOC NEPHROLOGY
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.250

关键词

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; Blood pressure variability; Chronic kidney diseases; Hypertension; Kidney transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the ambulatory blood pressure profiles and short-term blood pressure variability between kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients without kidney replacement therapy. The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of ambulatory blood pressure levels, blood pressure trajectories, and blood pressure variability indices.
Background: Hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor in both kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the gold-standard method for hypertension management in these subjects. This is the first study evaluating the full ambulatory blood pressure (BP) profile and short-term BP variability (BPV) in KTRs versus CKD patients without kidney replacement therapy. Methods: Ninety-three KTRs were matched with 93 CKD patients for age, sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. All participants underwent 24-hour ABPM. Mean ambulatory BP levels, BP trajectories, and BPV indices (standard deviation [SD], weighted SD, and average real variability) were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant between-group differences in 24-hour systolic BP (SBP)/diastolic BP (DBP) (KTRs: 126.9 ?? 13.1/79.1 ?? 7.9 mmHg vs. CKD: 128.1 ?? 11.2/77.9 ?? 8.1 mmHg, p = 0.52/0.29), daytime SBP/DBP and nighttime SBP; nighttime DBP was slightly higher in KTRs (KTRs: 76.5 ?? 8.8 mmHg vs. CKD: 73.8 ?? 8.8 mmHg, p = 0.04). Repeated measurements analysis of variance showed a significant effect of time on both ambulatory SBP and DBP (SBP: F = [19, 3002] = 11.735, p < 0.001, partial T12 = 0.069) but not of KTR/CKD status (SBP: F = [1, 158] = 0.668, p = 0.42, partial T12 = 0.004). Ambulatory systolic/diastolic BPV indices were not different between KTRs and CKD patients, except for 24-hour DBP SD that was slightly higher in the latter group (KTRs: 10.2 ?? 2.2 mmHg vs. CKD: 10.9 ?? 2.6 mmHg, p = 0.04). No differences were noted in dipping pattern between the two groups. Conclusion: Mean ambulatory BP levels, BP trajectories, and short-term BPV indices are not significantly different between KTRs and CKD patients, suggesting that KTRs have a similar ambulatory BP profile compared to CKD patients without kidney replacement therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据