4.7 Article

The effect of salinity on ammonium-assimilating biosystems in hypersaline wastewater treatment

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 829, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER

关键词

Hypersaline wastewater; Ammonium-assimilating biosystems; Nutrient removal; Bacterial community

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1906221]
  2. Major Program of Shandong Province Technologi-cal Innovation Project [2020CXGC011403]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC0310704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study confirms the feasibility and stability of the ammonium-assimilating biosystem in hypersaline wastewater treatment. Although the removal efficiency of ammonium and phosphate decreased under high salinity, the direction of nitrogen conversions remained unaffected by salinity.
The ammonium-assimilating biosystem is a promising solution to improve the susceptible biological nitrogen removal (BNR) and to achieve nitrogen recovery in saline wastewater treatment. However, the treatment performance and functional stability of ammonium-assimilating biosystems have not been fully illuminated in hypersaline wastewater. In this study, although the dramatic decrease of removal efficiency of NH4+-N and PO43--P was observed in ammonium-assimilating biosystems under the salinity from 3% to 7%, the direction of nitrogen conversions through assimilation was insusceptible to high salinity. The extremely low concentrations of nitrite and nitrate accumulation and abundances of nitrification functional genes confirmed that the process of nitrification was negligible in all biosystems. Ammonium-assimilating biosystems maintained robustness and functional stability in hypersaline wastewater. The increase of salinity stimulated the production of EPS and changed the microbial community by enriching Proteobacteria and halophilic genera. We anticipate that the ammonium-assimilating biosystem could be a promising strategy for hypersaline wastewater treatment and future practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据