4.0 Article

Practice of perioperative phantom limb pain prevention in Germany: a nationwide survey

期刊

ANAESTHESIOLOGIE
卷 71, 期 11, 页码 834-845

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00101-022-01188-7

关键词

Neuropathic pain; Phantom limb pain; Postoperative pain; Prevention and control; Surveys and questionnaires

资金

  1. AMS Stiftung

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to assess the current state of perioperative anesthesiological pain management for patients with phantom limb pain. It reveals the unmet need for specialized pain treatment during this period and suggests further research questions.
Background The prevalence of phantom limb pain after major amputation remains high and affected patients suffer from relevant impairments in the quality of life. Perioperative treatment strategies may prevent phantom limb pain. This study aims to assess the state of the perioperative anesthesiological pain management for major amputations. Furthermore, it analyzes potentials for optimization and barriers towards a better treatment of patients with amputations. Material and methods This online survey was distributed by the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) mailing list of anesthesiological consultants. It was approved by the Charite ethics board. Results Overall, 402 persons participated in this survey. Mostly, general anesthesia (85%), regional anesthesia (63%) and neuraxial anesthesia (49%) were performed in different combinations. Furthermore, 72% of participants reported using i.v. opioids postoperatively, mostly applied via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In contrast, preoperative regional anesthesia (74%) and gabapentinoids (67%) were seen as potential methods to improve treatment; however, barrier analysis revealed that treatment options are limited especially by organizational aspects and intrinsic patient factors. Conclusion This survey describes the current practice of phantom limb pain prevention in Germany. It shows an unmet need for specialized perioperative pain treatment. As the evidence regarding treatment recommendations is limited, further research questions can be deduced from this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据