4.7 Article

Bi-LSTM Model for Time Series Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Multiple Satellite Products

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2022.3199765

关键词

Bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM); deep learning (DL); leaf area index (LAI); time series

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [42071352]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0608702]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences Light of West China Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) approach to improve the estimation of time series leaf area index (LAI). By integrating information from multiple satellite products, including Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS), moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), and visible infrared imaging radiometer (VIIRS) LAI products, as well as MODIS reflectance, the Bi-LSTM method achieves better accuracy and smoother temporal profiles than other retrieval approaches.
Time series leaf area index (LAI) is essential to studying vegetation dynamics and climate changes. The LAI at current status can be regarded as the accumulative consequence of the counterpart at prior times. Although the deep learning (DL) algorithm, long short-term memory (LSTM), can capture long-time dependencies from sequential satellite data for time series LAI estimation, it only uses the information at prior statuses and neglects the backward propagation of current vegetation change information. Thus, the LSTM-based LAI quality might be limited. In this letter, the bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) approach was proposed to integrate the information of multiple satellite products from both the past and future for temporal LAI retrieval. The fused values from Global Land Surface Satellite (GLASS), moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), and visible infrared imaging radiometer (VIIRS) LAI products, as well as MODIS reflectance in 2014-2015, serve as the output response and input for the Bi-LSTM training. Then, we compared the Bi-LSTM predictions with the counterparts from the LSTM, the fused LAI, and three products using independent validation datasets in 2016. Results illustrated that our proposed Bi-LSTM method achieved better performance with higher accuracy (R-2 = 0.84 and RMSE = 0.76) when compared to the LSTM estimation (R-2 = 0.83 and RMSE = 0.82) and LAI products (R-2 < 0.68 and RMSE > 1). Furthermore, our proposed method provided smoother and more continuous temporal profiles of LAI than other retrieval approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据