4.6 Article

CFD modeling of a membrane reactor concept for integrated CO2 capture and conversion

期刊

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 2573-2581

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2re00282e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Guangzhou Elite Project [JY201801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study develops a membrane reactor concept using a ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane for integrated CO2 capture and conversion, achieving high CO2 capture rates and conversions through increasing membrane permeation flux and reactor design.
Capturing CO2 and converting it into valuable products represents a future direction of carbon emissions reduction. The emergence of CO2-permeable membranes has opened up a broad range of new opportunities for efficient CO2 capture and conversion. In this context, this study develops a membrane reactor concept using a ceramic-carbonate dual-phase membrane for integrated CO2 capture and conversion. The membrane reactor has two concentric tubes, with the inner tube being for the flue gas to provide a CO2 source and the outer for the CO2 conversion. The catalyst is coated on the membrane surface instead of being packed in the reactor bed so that the permeated CO2 can be immediately converted, and the CO2 permeation flux can be significantly promoted in this manner. The performance of the developed membrane reactor concept is evaluated based on CFD simulations. The membrane reactor can achieve high CO2 capture rates of over 90% and conversions of up to 95% for the reaction of the reverse water gas shift. The CO productivity is limited by the membrane permeation flux and large reactor volume, and can be increased by compact designs that increase the ratio of the membrane area to the reactor volume, which are simple but effective approaches to increasing CO productivity, but maintain high CO2 capture rates and conversions. The developed membrane reactor concept can be readily applied to any other reaction for integrated CO2 capture and conversion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据