4.7 Article

Interactions of neurokinin B with copper(ii) ions and their potential biological consequences

期刊

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
卷 51, 期 37, 页码 14267-14276

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt02033e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Faculty of Chemistry, University of Wroclaw from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [0420/2909/18]
  2. National Science Centre of Poland (NCN) [2018/29/B/ST4/01634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the coordination between neurokinin B (NKB) and Cu(ii) in preeclampsia. The results show that the interaction between NKB and Cu(ii) weakens in the presence of SDS, which may serve as a molecular switch for specific Cu(ii) delivery to membrane receptors. Additionally, the calculations based on clinical data suggest a potential toxic role of Cu(ii)NKB in preeclampsia development.
Preeclampsia is a blood pressure disorder associated with significant proteinuria. Hypertensive women have increased levels of neurokinin B (NKB) and Cu(ii) ions in blood plasma during pregnancy. NKB bears the ATCUN/NTS N-terminal motif empowering strong Cu(ii) binding in a characteristic four-nitrogen (4N) square-planar motif, but an alternative Cu(ii)NKB2 geometry was proposed earlier. We studied the coordination of DMHD-NH2, representing the NKB ATCUN/NTS motif, to Cu(ii) by potentiometry, electronic absorption and circular dichroism spectroscopy in water and SDS micellar solutions. NKB was studied in SDS micelles. The experiments were aided by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. We found that under all investigated conditions NKB formed solely 1 : 1 complexes. In the absence of SDS, the 4N complex at physiological pH 7.4 has a very low dissociation constant of 3.5 fM, but the interaction with SDS weakened the binding nearly thousand-fold. This interaction may serve as a molecular switch for specific Cu(ii) delivery to membrane receptors by NKB. Furthermore, the calculations based on clinical data indicate a potential toxic role of Cu(ii)NKB in preeclampsia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据