4.7 Article

Radial basis functions based on differential quadrature method for the free vibration analysis of laminated composite arbitrarily shaped plates

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 65-78

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.027

关键词

Layered structures; Vibration; Numerical analysis; Computational modelling; Strong formulation finite element method

资金

  1. FCT [PTDC/EMS-PRO/2044/2012]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EMS-PRO/2044/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conventional strong form collocation approach known as Differential Quadrature (DQ) method has been applied in the past to a vast type of engineering problems. It is well-known that its application is strictly limited to regular regions where derivatives are approximated along mesh lines. Generally, its accuracy increases when the number of collocation points is large and the method tends to be stable. However, for some numerical problems several points are needed in order to obtain an accurate solution. Changing the basis functions another numerical technique was developed called Radial Basis Functions (RBFs) method, which has the advantage of approximating derivatives using irregular point distributions and the basis functions depend on the mutual radial distance of the grid points. In order to extend the idea of DQ method to a general case a Radial Basis Function based on Differential Quadrature (RBF-DQ) method has been recently developed. This method merges the advantages of both techniques. Furthermore, this work proposes the application of RBF-DQ when a domain decomposition technique is considered. In this way it will be shown that, using some kind of basis functions the number of grid points per element can be reduced compared to other classical approaches. Furthermore, once the shape parameter is fixed for one case, it is not needed to calculate it again for other applications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据