4.4 Article

Comparison of physician and artificial intelligence-based symptom checker diagnostic accuracy

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 42, 期 12, 页码 2167-2176

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05202-4

关键词

Telemedicine; Symptom checker; Artificial intelligence; Diagnostic decision support system; Rheumatology; Diagnosis

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nurnberg, Germany [33419272]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [DFGFOR 2886 PANDORA-B01/A03/Z01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the accuracy of an AI-based symptom checker (Ada) to physicians in diagnosing inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). The study found that Ada had higher diagnostic accuracy compared to physicians when considering basic health and symptom-related medical history. These results highlight the potential of using symptom checkers early in the patient journey and the importance of complete patient information for accurate diagnosis.
Symptom checkers are increasingly used to assess new symptoms and navigate the health care system. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based symptom checker (Ada) and physicians regarding the presence/absence of an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). In this survey study, German-speaking physicians with prior rheumatology working experience were asked to determine IRD presence/absence and suggest diagnoses for 20 different real-world patient vignettes, which included only basic health and symptom-related medical history. IRD detection rate and suggested diagnoses of participants and Ada were compared to the gold standard, the final rheumatologists' diagnosis, reported on the discharge summary report. A total of 132 vignettes were completed by 33 physicians (mean rheumatology working experience 8.8 (SD 7.1) years). Ada's diagnostic accuracy (IRD) was significantly higher compared to physicians (70 vs 54%, p = 0.002) according to top diagnosis. Ada listed the correct diagnosis more often compared to physicians (54 vs 32%, p < 0.001) as top diagnosis as well as among the top 3 diagnoses (59 vs 42%, p < 0.001). Work experience was not related to suggesting the correct diagnosis or IRD status. Confined to basic health and symptom-related medical history, the diagnostic accuracy of physicians was lower compared to an AI-based symptom checker. These results highlight the potential of using symptom checkers early during the patient journey and importance of access to complete and sufficient patient information to establish a correct diagnosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据