4.5 Article

Biomechanical characteristics of 2 different posterior fixation methods of bilateral pedicle screws: A finite element analysis

期刊

MEDICINE
卷 101, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030419

关键词

bilateral pedicle screws; finite element analysis; internal fixation; lumbar spine; spinal biomechanics

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Key Research and Development Program of China [2021C03130]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars [LR22A020002]
  3. Public Welfare Science & Technology Project of Ningbo, China [2021S134]
  4. Basic Scientific Research Funds of Provincial Ningbo University [SJWY2022014]
  5. K. C. Wong Magna Fund of Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used finite element analysis to explore the biomechanical characteristics of two posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation methods. The results showed that a smaller number of pedicle screw fixation can achieve similar stability as a larger number of fixation, and effectively reduce the stress on the screws and rods, reducing the risk of fracture. The 3D finite element model established in this study can serve as a reference for further studies on spinal column biomechanics.
Background: To explore the biomechanical characteristics of 2 posterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation methods using finite element analysis. Methods: A normal L3-5 finite element model was established. Based on the verification of its effectiveness, 2 different posterior internal fixation methods were simulated: bilateral pedicle screws (model A) were placed in the L3 and L5 vertebral bodies, and bilateral pedicle screws (model B) were placed in the L3, L4, and L5 vertebral bodies. The stability and stress differences of intervertebral discs, endplates, screws, and rods between models were compared. Results: Compared with the normal model, the maximum stress of the range of motion, intervertebral disc, and endplate of the 2 models decreased significantly. Under the 6 working conditions, the 2 internal fixation methods have similar effects on the stress of the endplate and intervertebral disc, but the maximum stress of the screws and rods of model B is smaller than that of model A. Conclusions: Based on these results, it was found that bilateral pedicle screw fixation in 2 vertebrae L3 and L5 can achieve similar stability as bilateral pedicle screw fixation in 3 vertebrae L3, L4, and L5. However, the maximum stress of the screw and rod in model B is less than that in model A, so this internal fixation method can effectively reduce the risk of fracture. The 3-dimensional finite element model established in this study is in line with the biomechanical characteristics of the spine and can be used for further studies on spinal column biomechanics. This information can serve as a reference for clinicians for surgical selection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据