4.1 Article

Behavioral Assessment of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

期刊

SEMINARS IN NEUROLOGY
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 249-258

出版社

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756298

关键词

brain injury; coma; consciousness; assessment

资金

  1. Epstein Foundation
  2. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [U01 NS1365885]
  4. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [U01-NS086090, 1U01NS093334-01, U54N]
  5. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research [90DPCP0008-01-00, 90DP0039]
  6. Tiny Blue Dot Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Defense [W81XWH-14-2-0176]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessing the level of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness is critical for diagnosis and treatment evaluation. While standardized behavioral assessment is recommended over routine evaluation, it is still susceptible to biases and misdiagnosis. Factors that may confound the examination should be considered.
Severe brain injury is associated with a period of impaired level of consciousness that can last from days to months and results in chronic impairment. Systematic assessment of level of function in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is critical for diagnosis, prognostication, and evaluation of treatment efficacy. Approximately 40% of patients who are thought to be unconscious based on clinical bedside behavioral assessment demonstrate some signs of consciousness on standardized behavioral assessment. This finding, in addition to a growing body of literature demonstrating the advantages of standardized behavioral assessment of DoC, has led multiple professional societies and clinical guidelines to recommend standardized assessment over routine clinical evaluation of consciousness. Nevertheless, even standardized assessment is susceptible to biases and misdiagnosis, and examiners should consider factors, such as fluctuating arousal and aphasia, that may confound evaluation. We review approaches to behavioral assessment of consciousness, recent clinical guideline recommendations for use of specific measures to evaluate patients with DoC, and strategies for mitigating common biases that may confound the examination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据