3.8 Proceedings Paper

TCAD Simulation of InP DHBTs With an In53.2Ga46.8As Base and InGaAsP Collector Grading

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/IWMTS54901.2022.9832460

关键词

InP DHBT; InGaAsP collector; TCAD simulation

类别

-

资金

  1. DFG [SFB/TRR 196]
  2. EU
  3. State of North-Rhine Westphalia within the EFRE 2014-2020 framework Investment in Growth and Employment under the project Terahertz-Integrationszentrum (THzIZ) [EFRE-0400215]
  4. BMBF ForLab SmartBeam within the German federal government program Research and Innovation 2016-20 [Fkz. 16ES0936]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the causes and improvements of the non-linear behavior of InP DHBTs through physical simulations. The simulated devices have triple mesa structures with type-I band alignment and utilize a carbon-doped In53.2Ga46.8As base, 0.5 μm emitter width, and InGaAsP material in the collector region for enhanced electron transport. The simulations showed a 5 dB difference in OIP3 values between two devices, and a significant discrepancy in RF performance in terms of transit frequency and maximum frequency of oscillation. The improved design also demonstrated better electron transport across the collector region, highlighting the collector design's high sensitivity to device performance.
This work focuses on causes and improvements of non-linear behavior of InP DHBTs from a physical simulation point of view. The simulated devices are based on triple mesa structures with type-I band alignment employing a carbon doped In53.2Ga46.8As base, 0.5 mu m emitter width and InGaAsP material in the collector region to improve the electron transport. Simulated OIP3 values differed by about 5 dB between two devices. RF performance, in terms of transit frequency and maximum frequency of oscillation, differed by about 75 GHz and 87 GHz for the same device designs. The improved design also showed better electron transport across the collector region, underlining the high sensitivity of device performance effected by the collector design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据