4.6 Article

Main-chain flexibility and hydrophobicity of ionenes strongly impact their antimicrobial activity: an extended study on drug resistance strains and Mycobacterium

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 40, 页码 26220-26232

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra04121a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Center, Poland [2015/18/E/ST5/00222]
  2. Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and the resurgence of tuberculosis disease have driven the search for new antimicrobial agents. Synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides (SMAMPs) show promise as they act by disrupting cell membranes. This study aims to understand the influence of hydrophobicity, main-chain flexibility, and the topology of ionenes on their activity.
The spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and the resurgence of tuberculosis disease are major motivations to search for novel antimicrobial agents. Some promising candidates in this respect are cationic polymers, also known as synthetic mimics of antimicrobial peptides (SMAMPs), which act through the membrane-lytic mechanism. Development of resistance toward SMAMPs is less likely than toward currently employed antibiotics; however, further studies are needed to better understand their structure-activity relationship. The main objective of this work is to understand the cross-influence of hydrophobicity, main-chain flexibility, and the topology of ionenes (polycations containing a cationic moiety within the main-chain) on activity. To fulfill this goal, a library of ionenes was developed and compared with previously investigated molecules. The obtained compounds display promising activity against the model microorganisms and drug-resistance clinical isolates, including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The killing efficiency was also investigated, and results confirm a strong effect of hydrophobicity, revealing higher activity for molecules possessing the flexible linker within the polymer main-chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据